4.6 Article

Dengue virus circulation and evolution in Mexico:: A phylogenetic perspective

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 760-773

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.02.004

关键词

dengue; evolution; phylogenetic analysis; Mexico

资金

  1. FIC NIH HHS [D43 TW001130-04, D43 TW001130, D43 TW001130-03, D43 TW001130-05] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-45430, R01 AI046753-04, R01 AI046753-03, U01 AI045430, U01 AI045430-04, AI-46753, R01 AI046753-02, U01 AI045430-03, R01 AI046753, U01 AI045430-02] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [25489] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Dengue is the most important arthropod-borne viral infection in the Americas. In the last decades a progressive increment in dengue severity has been observed in Mexico and other countries of the region. Methods. Molecular epidemiological studies were conducted to investigate the viral determinants of the emergence of epidemic dengue, dengue hemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome as major public health problems in Mexico. Bayesian phylogenetic analyses were conducted to determine the origin, persistence and geographical dispersion of the four serotypes of dengue virus (DENV) isolated in Mexico between 1980 and 2002. Tests for natural selection were also conducted. Results. The origin of some, but not all, strains circulating in Mexico could be inferred. Frequent lineage replacements were observed and were likely due to stochastic events. In situ evolution was detected but not associated with natural selection. Recent changes in the incidence and severity of dengue were temporally associated with the introduction and circulation of different serotypes and genotypes of DENV. Conclusions. Introduction of new DENV genotypes and serotypes is a major risk factor for epidemic dengue and severe disease. Increased surveillance for such introductions is critical to allow public health authorities to intervene in impending epidemics. (C) 2006 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据