4.6 Article

Mechanical ventilation induces inflammation, lung injury, and extra-pulmonary organ dysfunction in experimental pneumonia

期刊

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 86, 期 8, 页码 790-799

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700440

关键词

acute lung injury; inflammation; mechanical ventilation; multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P50 HL073996, K08 HL071020] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [T32 AI007044-29] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mechanical ventilation ( MV) is frequently employed for the management of critically ill patients with respiratory failure. A major complication of mechanical ventilation ( MV) is the development of ventilator-associated pneumonia ( VAP), in which Staphylococcus aureus is a prominent pathogen. Moreover, previous studies suggest that MV may be an important cofactor in the development of acute lung injury ( ALI) and the acute respiratory distress syndrome ( ARDS). S. aureus pulmonary infection was induced in spontaneously breathing mice ( C57BI/6) or mechanically ventilated mice to determine whether MV contributes to the development of ALI and/or systemic inflammation. The combination of MV and bacteria significantly increased the influx of neutrophils into bronchoalveolar lavage fluid ( BALF), augmented pulmonary production of the proinflammatory cytokines KC, MIP-2, TNF-alpha, and IL-6, and increased alveolar-capillary permeability to proteins. MV also induced proinflammatory cytokine expression in peripheral blood, associated with extrapulmonary hepatic and renal dysfunction. Surprisingly, bacterial clearance in the lungs and extrapulmonary bacterial dissemination was not affected by MV. These data indicate that MV exacerbates both pulmonary and systemic inflammation in response to bacteria and contributes to the pathogenesis of both ALI and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, without necessarily affecting bacterial clearance or extra-pulmonary bacterial dissemination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据