4.6 Article

The electroretinogram components in Abyssinian cats with hereditary retinal degeneration

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 47, 期 8, 页码 3673-3682

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1283

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To examine phototransduction using the a-wave and other aspects of retinal function with the intraretinal b- and c-waves at different stages of an inherited photoreceptor degeneration in Abyssinian cats. METHODS. Vitreal and intraretinal ERGs were recorded from eight dark-adapted, anesthetized Abyssinian cats. Brief bright flashes were used to elicit vitreal a- and b- waves. Longer, weaker flashes were used to elicit intraretinal b- and c-waves. Stages 1 through 4 of the disease were characterized ophthalmoscopically. Parameters of the Lamb and Pugh a- wave model (a(max), A, and t(eff)) for the Abyssinian cats were compared with those for normal cats. Light microscopy was used to count photoreceptor nuclei. RESULTS. The maximum a-wave amplitude, a max, was significantly smaller in stage 1, and continued to decrease (stage 1: 50% of normal, stage 2: 28%, stage 3: 27%; and stage 4: unrecordable). There was a small, but not significant, decrease in the amplification constant A from 0.24 +/- 0.11 s(-2) in normal cats to 0.16 +/- 0.08 s(-2) in Abyssinian cats. The intraretinal band c-wave amplitudes decreased most dramatically during the early stage of the disease. Affected animals had fewer photoreceptors than unaffected Abyssinians or control animals. The number of photoreceptors declined most rapidly in the inferior periphery. CONCLUSIONS. The amplitudes of all ERG components were already reduced significantly by stage 1 and progressively declined. The lack of major changes in a- wave model parameters indicates that the degeneration is probably not due to a mutation in transduction proteins. Losses of photoreceptor function were larger than losses of photoreceptor nuclei.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据