4.4 Article

Functional characterization of HIV-1 Nef mutants in the context of viral infection

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 351, 期 2, 页码 322-339

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2006.03.044

关键词

HIV Nef; mutant virus panel; virion incorporation; myristoylation; cell surface receptor modulation; infectivity; replication

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nef is an important pathogenesis factor of HIV-1 with a multitude of effector functions. We have designed a broad panel of isogenic viruses encoding defined mutants of HIV-1(SF2) Nef and analyzed their biological activity in the context of productive HIV-1 infection. Analysis of subcellular localization, virion incorporation, downregulation of cell surface CD4 and MHC-1, enhancement of virion infectivity and facilitation of HIV replication in primary human T lymphocytes mostly confirmed the mapping of Nef determinants previously reported upon isolated expression of Nef. However, reduced activity in downregulation of CD4, infectivity enhancement and virion incorporation of a Nef variant (A 1239) lacking an amphipatic helix required for binding of a cellular kinase complex and the association of Nef with MHC-1/AP-1 suggested a novel role of this N-terminal motif. The SH3 binding motif of Nef was partially required for infectivity enhancement and replication but not for receptor downmodulation. In contrast to previous results obtained using other Nef alleles, non-myristoylated SF2-Nef was only partly defective when expressed during HIV infection and was present in HIV-1 particles. Importantly, incorporation of Nef into HIV-1 virions was not required for any of the tested Nef activities. Altogether, this study provides a broad characterization and mapping of multiple Nef activities in HIV-infected cells. The results emphasize that multiple activities govern Nef's effects on HIV replication and argue against a role of virion incorporation for Nef's activity as pathogenicity factor. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据