4.7 Article

European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): outpatient penicillin use in Europe

期刊

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 408-412

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl186

关键词

antibiotic use; penicillins; drug consumption; pharmacoepidemiology; ambulatory care; Europe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Data on outpatient penicillin use in Europe were collected from 25 countries within the ESAC project, funded by DG SANCO of the European Commission, using the WHO ATC/DDD methodology. Methods: For the period 1997-2003, data on outpatient use of systemic penicillins aggregated at the level of the active substance were collected and expressed in DDD (WHO, version 2004) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Of the 'Penicillins' (J01C), outpatient use of narrow-spectrum penicillins (J01CE), broadspectrum penicillins (J01CA), penicillinase-resistant penicillins (J01CF) and combinations with P-lactamase inhibitors (J01CR) in 25 European countries was analysed in detail. Results: Total outpatient penicillin use in 2003 varied by a factor of 4 between the country with the highest (15.27 DID in Slovakia) and lowest use (3.86 DID in the Netherlands). Narrow-spectrum penicillins, broad-spectrum penicillins and combinations with P-lactamase inhibitors were used most in 4,12 and 9 countries, respectively. Penicillin use increased by more than 1 DID in nine countries, whereas it decreased by more than 1 DID in two countries (Czech Republic, France). An increase of the use of combinations with R-lactamase inhibitors by more than 10% in 10 countries coincided with an equal decrease of broad-spectrum penicillins in seven countries and narrow-spectrum penicillins in three countries. Conclusion: Penicillins represent the most widely used antibiotic class in all 25 participating countries; albeit with considerable variation of their use patterns. A distinct shift from narrow-spectrum penicillins to broad-spectrum penicillins, and specifically their combinations with P-lactamase inhibitors, was observed during the period 1997-2003.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据