4.2 Article

Expression and purification of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex-restricted antigen CFP21 to study its immunoprophylactic potential in mouse model

期刊

PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 274-280

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2006.03.010

关键词

Mycobacterium tuberculosis; CFP21; culture filtrate proteins; subunit vaccine; regions of difference

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secreted proteins encoded by different regions of difference (RDs) from the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis have been considered as attractive candidates for vaccination against tuberculosis owing to their absence in most BCG strains. In this study, the structural gene for the RD2 locus encoding protein CFP21 was PCR amplified and expressed as a fusion protein with hexahistidine residues in Escherichia coli. Expression of CFP21 in E. coli under transcriptional regulation of the T7 promoter yielded a protein located within inclusion bodies. The inclusion bodies were solubilized in the presence of 8 M urea and the protein was purified to homogeneity under denaturing conditions at low pH using nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) affinity chromatography. The denatured protein was renatured by gradient dialysis against a decreasing concentration of urea. The purified protein was shown to have esterase activity. CFP21 protein was evaluated for immunogenicity in C57BL/6J mice. We observed an elevated T cell proliferative response and production of IFN-gamma and L-12 (p40). CFP21 also induced an optimum level of cytotoxic T cell activity and induced a strong humoral response as indicated by higher levels of specific IgG1 and IgG2a antibody isotypes. In addition, a moderate level of protection was observed against experimental tuberculosis. This is the first report describing esterase activity of the M. tuberculosis complex-restricted protein CFP21 and its protective potential against experimental tuberculosis. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据