4.5 Article

Interaction formulae for members subjected to bending and axial compression in EUROCODE 3 - the Method 2 approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 8, 页码 757-770

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2005.11.018

关键词

interaction formulae; buckling of beam-columns; EUROCODE 3

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The final version of EN1993-1-1, EUROCODE 3 [EN1993-1-1. Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures, general rules and rules for buildings. 2005] for Steel Structures provides two alternatives for the buckling check of members subjected to axial compression and bending by interaction formulae, which are called there Method 1 and Method 2. This paper presents the characteristics, the background and the use of Method 2. The analogous presentation of Method 1 has already been given in [Boissonnade N, Jaspart J-P, Muzeau J-P, Villette M. New Interaction formulae for beam-columns in Eurocode 3. The French-Belgian approach. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2004;60;421-31]. The Method 2 formulae have been derived on the basis of the general format of the interaction concept of existing codes, e.g. the ENV-rules; however with advanced numerical background and consistent classification of the buckling modes. In this respect new improved interaction factors were developed from a wide scope of numerical simulations and the concept of the formulae was focussed distinctly on describing the modes of in-plane and out-of-plane buckling for members susceptible to fail either in flexural buckling or in lateral-torsional buckling. As result two sets of formulae are provided, which-each cover a clear scope of physical member behaviour. Hereby, the specific effects of intermediate lateral restraints-as often found in steel structures-have also been included. The Method 2 formulae aim at providing buckling rules with compact simplified interaction factors and transparent application for standard cases. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据