4.7 Article

Increased cytotoxicity of ionizing radiation in combination with membrane-targeted apoptosis modulators involves downregulation of protein kinase B/Akt-mediated survival-signaling

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 80, 期 2, 页码 199-206

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.07.021

关键词

erucylphosphocholine; erufosine; apoptosis; protein kinase B; FOXO3A; Bcl-2 proteins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: The membrane-targeted apoptosis modulators erucylphosphocholine (ErPC) and erucylphosphohomocholine (ErPC3) induce apoptosis in highly apoptosis resistant malignant glioma cell lines and enhance radiation-induced cell death and eradication of clonogenic tumor cells in vitro. Aim of the present study was to elucidate molecular mechanisms of combined action. Materials and methods: Induction of apoptosis was evaluated by determination of nuclear morphology (fluorescence microscopy), alteration of mitochondrial function and caspase-activation (flow cytometry, Western blot). Activity of protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) and key downstream effectors involved in apoptosis regulation was verified by Western blot analysis using activation-specific antibodies. Results: Increased cytotoxicity of the combination was linked to a more efficient activation of the intrinsic apoptosis pathway with increased damage of the mitochondria and caspase-activation. Moreover, activity of the survival kinase PKB/Akt was downregulated upon treatment with ErPC/ErPC3 alone or in combination with ionizing radiation. Inhibition of PKB/Akt was associated with decreased phosphorylation and thus activation of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein Bad as well as dephosphorylation of the transcription factor FOXO3A (FKHRL1) that may be responsible for the observed increased expression of the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 protein Bim. Conclusions: Our data suggest a role for inhibition of PKB/Akt-mediated anti-apoptotic signaling in increased efficacy of the combination. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据