4.7 Article

Biomarker and drug-target discovery using proteomics in a new rat model of sepsis-induced acute renal failure

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 70, 期 3, 页码 496-506

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001575

关键词

sepsis; acute renal failure; rat model; proteomics; DIGE

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 DK043400-08, Z01 DK043403-08] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sepsis is one of the common causes of acute renal failure (ARF). The objective of this study was to identify new biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We present a new rat model of sepsis-induced ARF based on cecal ligation and puncture (CLIP). We used this model to find urinary proteins which may be potential biomarkers and/or drug targets. Aged rats were treated with fluids and antibiotics after CLIP. Urinary proteins from septic rats without ARF and urinary proteins from septic rats with ARF were compared by difference in-gel electrophoresis (DIGE). CLIP surgery elevated interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10 serum cytokines and blood nitrite compared with sham-operated rats. However, there was a range of serum creatinine values at 24 h (0.4-2.3 mg/dl) and only 24% developed ARE Histology confirmed renal injury in these rats. Forty-nine percent of rats did not develop ARF. Rats without ARF also had less liver injury. The mortality rate at 24h was 27% but was increased by housing the post-surgery rats in metabolic cages. Creatinine clearance and urine output 2-8 h after CLIP was significantly reduced in rats which died within 24 h. Using DIGE we identified changes in a number of urinary proteins including albumin, brush-border enzymes (e.g., meprin-l-alpha) and serine protease inhibitors. The meprin-1-alpha inhibitor actinonin prevented ARF in aged mice. In summary, we describe a new rat model of sepsis-induced ARF which has a heterogeneous response similar to humans. This model allowed us to use DIGE to find changes in urinary proteins and this approach identified a potential biomarker and drug target-meprin-1-alpha.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据