4.7 Article

Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cytology in women screened for cervical cancer in the United States, 2003-2005

期刊

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 148, 期 7, 页码 493-500

出版社

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-7-200804010-00004

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Millions of women in the United States receive cervical screening in sexually transmitted disease (STD), family planning, and primary care clinical settings. Objective: To inform current cervical screening programs. Design: Measurement of abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) tests and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection among demographically diverse women who received routine cervical screening from January 2003 to December 2005 in the United States. Setting: 26 STD, family planning, and primary care clinics in 6 U.S. cities. Patients: 9657 women age 14 to 65 years receiving routine cervical screening. Measurements: Pap test results and high-risk HPV prevalence by Hybrid Capture 2 assay (Digene, Gaithersburg, Maryland). Results: Among 9657 patients, overall high-risk HPV prevalence by Hybrid Capture 2 testing was 23% (95% Cl, 22% to 24%). Prevalence was highest among women age 14 to 19 years (35% [Cl, 32% to 38%]) and lowest among women age 50 to 65 years (6% [Cl, 4% to 8%]). Prevalence by clinic type (adjusted for age and city) ranged from 26% (Cl, 24% to 29%) in STD clinics to 17% (Cl, 16% to 20%) in primary care clinics. Women younger than 30 years of age whose Pap test showed atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance had a high-risk HPV prevalence of 53%; women 30 years of age or older with normal Pap tests had a 9% prevalence. Values did not vary substantially by clinic type. Limitation: Hybrid Capture 2 and Pap testing were noncentralized, and consent was required for enrollment. Conclusion: High-risk HPV was widespread among women receiving cervical screening in the United States. Many women 30 years of age or older with normal Pap tests would need follow-up if Hybrid Capture 2 testing is added to cytology screening.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据