4.5 Article

Dynamics of the WPD loop of the Yersinia protein tyrosine phosphatase

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 91, 期 3, 页码 948-956

出版社

BIOPHYSICAL SOCIETY
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.080259

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [U19 AI056510, 1U19AI056510] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bacterial protein tyrosine phosphatase YopH is an essential virulence determinant in Yersinia spp., causing gastrointestinal diseases and the plague. Like eukaryotic PTPases, YopH catalyzes the hydrolysis of the phosphate moiety of phosphotyrosine within a highly conserved binding pocket, which is also characterized by the closure of the so- called ``WPD loop'' upon ligand binding. In this study, we investigate the conformational changes and dynamics of the WPD loop by molecular dynamics simulations. Consistent with experimental observations, our simulations show that the WPD loop of YopH is intrinsically flexible and fluctuates between the open and closed conformation with a frequency of similar to 4 ns for the apo, native protein. The region of helix alpha 4 spanning loop 384-392, which has been revealed experimentally as a second substrate-binding site in YopH, is found to be highly associated with the WPD loop, stabilizing it in the closed, active conformation, and providing a structural basis for the cooperation of the second-substrate binding site in substrate recognition. Loop L4 ( residues 323 -327) is shown to be involved in a parallel, correlated motion mode with the WPD loop that contributes the stabilization of a more extended open conformation. In addition, we have simulated the loop reopening in the ligand-bound protein complex by applying the locally enhanced sampling method. Finally, the dynamic behavior of the WPD loop for the C403S mutant differs from the wild-type YopH remarkably. These results shed light on the role of the WPD loop in PTPase-mediated catalysis, and are useful in structure-based design for novel, selective YopH inhibitors as antibacterial drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据