4.4 Article

Mechanisms involved in the enhancement of osteoclast formation by enamel matrix derivative

期刊

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 273-279

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00868.x

关键词

bone regeneration; enamel matrix derivative; osteoclast; periodontitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Objective: Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) is used clinically to promote periodontal tissue regeneration, and it has been reported that EMD can induce the formation of osteoclasts in mouse marrow cultures. In the present study, we investigated the mechanisms of EMD-induced osteoclast formation using a mouse monocytic cell line, RAW 264.7. Material and Methods: Bioactive fractions were purified from EMD by reverse-phase HPLC using a C-18 hydrophobic support, following which RAW 264.7 cells were cultured with EMD or its purified fractions in the presence of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) for 8 d. Following staining with tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), TRAP-positive multinucleated cells were counted. The expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK), as well as phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase, in RAW 264.7 cells were detected using immunoblotting. To determine whether EMD has an effect on osteoclast function, differentiated RAW 264.7 cells were cultured on Osteologic (TM) Multitest slides with RANKL in the presence of EMD. Results: Purified EMD fractions (fraction numbers 21-25; EMD peak 2) were found to enhance the formation and function of RAW 264.7 cells induced by RANKL. Moreover, EMD peak 2 enhanced the levels of phosphorylation of ERK p38 and RANK in RAW 264.7 cells stimulated with RANKL. Conclusion: Our results indicate that EMD induces the formation of osteoclasts through interaction with RANKL, while ERK and p38 MAPK may play a critical role in the enhancement of osteoclast formation in RAW 264.7 cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据