4.3 Article

Effect of lesion level on the orthotic gait performance in individuals with complete paraplegia

期刊

SPINAL CORD
卷 44, 期 8, 页码 487-494

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101916

关键词

spinal cord injury; orthotic gait; energy consumption; motion analysis; cardiorespiratory response

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study design: Cross-sectional, experimental research. Objectives: To clarify the effect of lesion level on cardio-respiratory responses and biomechanical characteristics of walking with a reciprocating gait orthosis in complete paraplegia with spinal cord injury (SCI). Setting: National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Japan. Methods: Ten SCI individuals (age: 20-34 years, injured level: Th5-12) who experienced orthotic gait training at least for 10 weeks participated in two experiments: (1) measurement of the cardiorespiratory responses during 20 min of orthotic gait exercise; and (2) three-dimensional motion analysis and ground reaction force measurement using the VICON system. We calculated the following parameters: pulmonary ventilation, oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), gait speed, cadence, stride length, crutch force (CF), hip range of motion (ROM), and hip angular velocity (VEL). Further, energy consumption and energy cost were calculated using the steady-state value of VO2 and gait speed. Results: The steady-state value of the VO2 (18.2 +/- 3.80 ml/kg) and HR (133.0 +/- 21.63 b/min) tended to be larger in higher thoracic SCI subjects. There were strong positive correlations between the lesion level and walking speed (r = 0.74), energy cost (r = 0.85), and hip ROM (r = 0.78). On the other hand, negative correlation between the lesion level and peak CF (r = -0.78) was clarified. Conclusions: The physiological intensity of the orthotic gait strongly depended on the level of lesion. It seems likely that a limited hip range of motion and excess upper limb load result in the low energy cost of orthotic gait for the higher thoracic level of paraplegic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据