4.5 Article

Abnormal cortical development after premature birth shown by altered allometric scaling of brain growth

期刊

PLOS MEDICINE
卷 3, 期 8, 页码 1382-1390

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030265

关键词

-

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U120081323] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S08916/01] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U120081323] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U120081323, MC_U120088465] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background We postulated that during ontogenesis cortical surface area and cerebral volume are related by a scaling law whose exponent gives a quantitative measure of cortical development. We used this approach to investigate the hypothesis that premature termination of the intrauterine environment by preterm birth reduces cortical development in a dose-dependent manner, providing a neural substrate for functional impairment. Methods and Findings We analyzed 274 magnetic resonance images that recorded brain growth from 23 to 48 wk of gestation in 113 extremely preterm infants born at 22 to 29 wk of gestation, 63 of whom underwent neurodevelopmental assessment at a median age of 2 y. Cortical surface area was related to cerebral volume by a scaling law with an exponent of 1.29 ( 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.33), which was proportional to later neurodevelopmental impairment. Increasing prematurity and male gender were associated with a lower scaling exponent (p < 0.0001) independent of intrauterine or postnatal somatic growth. Conclusions Human brain growth obeys an allometric scaling relation that is disrupted by preterm birth in a dose-dependent, sexually dimorphic fashion that directly parallels the incidence of neurodevelopmental impairments in preterm infants. This result focuses attention on brain growth and cortical development during the weeks following preterm delivery as a neural substrate for neurodevelopmental impairment after premature delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据