4.8 Article

Temporal trends and relationships of particulate chlorinated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their parent compounds in urban air

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 40, 期 15, 页码 4592-4598

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es0602703

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concentrations of 12 chlorinated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (CIPAHs) and the corresponding 5 parent PAHs associated with particulates in urban air in Shizuoka, Japan, were investigated from 1992 to 2002. Among the seven target CIPAHs that were detected in the air samples, 6-chlorobenzo[a]pyrene (6-CIBaP) had the highest mean concentration (15 pg m(-3)), followed by 1-chloropyrene (5.2 pg m(-3)) and 7-chlorobenz[a] anthracene (3.1 pg m(-3)). The concentrations of all the CIPAHs and PAHs, except 6-CIBaP, were higher in winter than in summer. Over the study period, the concentrations of the CIPAHs, except 6-CIBaP, remained almost constant, whereas the parent PAH concentrations declined moderately. There was significant correlation between the concentrations of the ClPAHs (except 3,9- and 9,10-dichlorophenanthrene) and the concentrations of the corresponding parent PAHs. Compositional analysis showed that the proportions of the detected PAHs generally did not vary over the period, whereas the proportion of 6-CIBaP relative to the total CIPAH concentration decreased over time. Comparison of the concentration profile of certain ClPAHs normalized to the concentration of 3-chlorofluoranthene, which is relatively photostable, with the profile for a traffic air sample reported previously revealed that there was no similarity between the two profiles. Factor analysis indicated that the atmospheric behavior of the CIPAHs, except for 6-CIBaP, may be similar to that of the parent PAHs, and that the atmospheric behavior of 6-CIBaP may differ from that of the other ClPAHs. The factor analysis also suggested that the emission sources for the ClPAHs (except for 6-CIBaP) may be similar to the sources of the parent PAHs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据