4.7 Article

Impact of a novel spray-chilling system on surface microflora, water activity and weight loss during beef carcass chilling

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 483-490

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2005.05.013

关键词

spray chilling; total viable counts; Enterobacteriaceae; cell injury; European commission decision 2001/471/EC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commercially slaughtered and dressed beef carcass sides (n = 30) were followed through a standard commercial chill unit fitted with a new Jasca air humidification system adjusted to provide intermittent water spraying of carcass sides (spray cycle 2 min on, I min off) for 15h. Immediately after dressing, and after 24h in the chill unit, the surface water activity, and the weight of each side was measured, and 5 cm(2) samples were recovered from four locations, i.e. rump, flank, brisket and neck on the surface of each side. These samples, and similar samples from control sides (it = 30) processed in a standard commercial chill unit, were subjected to microbiological examination by direct and resuscitation counts on plate count agar (PCA), MacConkey agar (MAC) and violet red bile glucose agar (VRBGA). No significant differences were observed between bacterial numbers on test and control samples on each of the above agars, Lit each sample point/occasion. Comparison of direct and resuscitation counts suggested the presence Of Substantial numbers of injured cells, at both stages (pre- and post-chill), on test and control sides. After 24h in chill units, test sides exhibited an average weight loss of 1.36% ( +/- 0.36%), which is significantly less (P < 0.001) than the average weight loss (1.55%+/- 0.24%) from control sides. These results suggest that the Jasca spray-chilling system can limit carcass shrinkage (on average by 0.19%) without significantly increasing the surface populations of selected bacterial groups. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据