4.5 Article

Angiogenic and antifibrotic actions of hepatocyte growth factor improve cardiac dysfunction in porcine ischemic cardiomyopathy

期刊

GENE THERAPY
卷 13, 期 16, 页码 1206-1213

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302740

关键词

angiogenesis; HGF; angina; myocardium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impairment of cardiac function in ischemic cardiomyopathy has been postulated to be due to the decrease in blood flow and increase in collagen synthesis. Therefore, an approach to alter them directly by means of a growth factor may open up a new therapeutic concept in ischemic cardiomyopathy. From this viewpoint, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a unique growth factor with angiogenic and antifibrotic effects. Thus, we examined the feasibility of gene therapy using HGF plasmid DNA for ischemic cardiomyopathy. Human HGF plasmid DNA at a dose of 0.4 or 4 mg was injected into ischemic myocardium of pigs induced by ameroid constrictor with the NOGA system. At 1 month after injection, the ischemic area was significantly reduced in the HGF group, accompanied by a significant increase in capillary density and regional myocardial perfusion in the ischemic area (P < 0.01). In contrast, a significant decrease in fibrotic area was observed in the HGF group, associated with a significant decrease in collagen I, III and TGF-beta synthesis as compared to the control group (P < 0.01). Consistently, cardiac function was significantly improved in the 4 mg HGF group as compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Overall, the present in vivo experiments demonstrated that intramyocardial injection of human HGF plasmid DNA in ischemic cardiomyopathy resulted in a significant improvement in cardiac function through an increase in blood flow and decrease in fibrosis. These favorable outcomes suggest potential utility to treat patients with ischemic heart disease using HGF gene transfer. Currently, a phase I study using human HGF plasmid DNA is ongoing to test the validity of this concept.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据