4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: is deep hypothermia required?

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 237-241

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.02.071

关键词

chronic pulmonary embolism; pulmonary hypertension; pulmonary endarterectomy; moderate hypothermia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate whether deep (< 20 degrees C) hypothermia is necessary in patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Methods: Between January 2004 and February 2005, 30 patients (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV) were randomly assigned to increasing (1 degrees C) levels of moderate (28-32 degrees C) hypothernnic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), each study group including six patients. Primary study endpoint was adverse neurological outcome. Overall preoperative total pulmonary vascular resistance was 1110 +/- 192 dyne S CM-5. Results: Mean CPB and cross-clamp times, and core temperature at the time of circulatory arrests were 129 +/- 39 min and 92 +/- 24 min, and 30.1 +/- 1.5 degrees C, respectively. Circulatory arrest was induced 2 +/- 0.7 times and its mean total duration was 10.3 +/- 5.2 min (range, 2-19 min). Postoperatively, three patients (10%) belonging to the 31 degrees C (n = 1) and 32 degrees C (n = 2) groups suffered from temporary neurological dysfunction. Postoperative mechanical ventilatory support and ICU stay were 26.3 +/- 18.9 h and 6.6 +/- 8.5 days, respectively, and uninfluenced by degree of hypothermia. There were no lung reperfusion injuries or any other major complications. All patients had a significant hemodynamic improvement. Conclusion: Results suggest that pulmonary endarterectomy can be safety performed with moderate hypothermia and short periods of circulatory arrests without the need of profound hypothermia. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据