4.0 Article

Role of DISC1 Interacting Proteins in Schizophrenia Risk from Genome-Wide Analysis of Missense SNPs

期刊

ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 77, 期 -, 页码 504-512

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ahg.12037

关键词

Psychosis; pathway analysis; actin cytoskeleton; axonal transport; gene set enrichment

资金

  1. ISCIII (Instituto de Salud Carlos III) [FIS/FEDER 08/1522]
  2. Xunta de Galicia [IN-CITE08PXIB9101149PR]
  3. REGENPSI (Red de Genetica de Enfermedades Neurologicas y Psiquiatricas) network (Xunta de Galicia)
  4. Medical Research Council [G0801418B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A balanced translocation affecting DISC1 cosegregates with several psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, in a Scottish family. DISC1 is a hub protein of a network of protein-protein interactions involved in multiple developmental pathways within the brain. Gene set-based analysis has been proposed as an alternative to individual analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to get information from genome-wide association studies. In this work, we tested for an overrepresentation of the DISC1 interacting proteins within the top results of our ranked list of genes based on our previous genome-wide association study of missense SNPs in schizophrenia. Our data set consisted of 5100 common missense SNPs genotyped in 476 schizophrenic patients and 447 control subjects from Galicia, NW Spain. We used a modification of the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis adapted for SNPs, as implemented in the GenGen software. The analysis detected an overrepresentation of the DISC1 interacting proteins (permuted P-value = 0.0158), indicative of the role of this gene set in schizophrenia risk. We identified seven leading-edge genes, MACF1, UTRN, DST, DISC1, KIF3A, SYNE1, and AKAP9, responsible for the overrepresentation. These genes are involved in neuronal cytoskeleton organization and intracellular transport through the microtubule cytoskeleton, suggesting that these processes may be impaired in schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据