4.5 Article

Modulators of cigarette smoke-induced pulmonary emphysema in A/J mice

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 92, 期 2, 页码 545-559

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfl016

关键词

A/J mice; animal models; cigarette smoke; pulmonary emphysema; morphometry; pulmonary function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mice develop pulmonary emphysema after chronic exposure to cigarette smoke (CS). In this study, the influence of gender, exposure duration, and concentration of CS on emphysema, pulmonary function, inflammation, markers of toxicity, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity was examined in A/J mice. Mice were exposed to CS at either 100 or 250 mg total particulate material/m(3) (CS-100 or CS-250, respectively) for 10, 16, or 22 weeks. Evidence of emphysema was first seen in female mice after 10 weeks of exposure to CS-250, while male mice did not develop emphysema until 16 weeks. Female mice exposed to CS-100 did not have emphysema until 16 weeks, suggesting that disease development depends on the concentration and duration of exposure. Airflow obstruction and increased pulmonary compliance were observed in mice exposed to CS-250 for 22 weeks. Decreased elasticity was likely the major contributor to airflow obstruction because substantial remodeling of the conducting airways, beyond mild mucous cell hyperplasia, was lacking. Exposure to CS increased the number of macrophages, neutrophils, lymphocytes (B cells and activated CD4- and CD8-positive T cells), and activity of MMP-2 and -9 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Treatment with antioxidants N-acetylcysteine or epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) did not decrease emphysema severity, but EGCG slightly decreased BALF inflammatory cell numbers and lactate dehydrogenase activity. Inflammation and emphysema persisted after a 17-week recovery period following exposure to CS-250 for 22 weeks. The similarities of this model to the human disease make it promising for studying disease pathogenesis and assessing new therapeutic interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据