4.0 Article

Dominant PRPF31 Mutations Are Hypostatic to a Recessive CNOT3 Polymorphism in Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Novel Phenomenon of Linked Trans-Acting Epistasis

期刊

ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 78, 期 1, 页码 62-71

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ahg.12042

关键词

PRPF31; CNOT3; retinitis pigmentosa; epistasis

资金

  1. Rosetrees Trust [M69]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [320030-121929, 310030_138346]
  3. Gebert Ruf Foundation, Switzerland
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [310030_138346, 320030-121929] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in PRPF31 are responsible for autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP, RP11 form) and affected families show nonpenetrance. Differential expression of the wildtype PRPF31 allele is responsible for this phenomenon: coinheritance of a mutation and a higher expressing wildtype allele provide protection against development of disease. It has been suggested that a major modulating factor lies in close proximity to the wildtype PRPF31 gene on Chromosome 19, implying that a cis-acting factor directly alters PRPF31 expression. Variable expression of CNOT3 is one determinant of PRPF31 expression. This study explored the relationship between CNOT3 (a trans-acting factor) and its paradoxical cis-acting nature in relation to RP11. Linkage analysis on Chromosome 19 was performed in mutation-carrying families, and the inheritance of the wildtype PRPF31 allele in symptomatic-asymptomatic sibships was assessedconfirming that differential inheritance of wildtype chromosome 19q13 determines the clinical phenotype (P < 2.6 x 10(-7)). A theoretical model was constructed that explains the apparent conflict between the linkage data and the recent demonstration that a trans-acting factor (CNOT3) is a major nonpenetrance factor: we propose that this apparently cis-acting effect arises due to the intimate linkage of CNOT3 and PRPF31 on Chromosome 19q13a novel mechanism that we have termed linked trans-acting epistasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据