4.7 Article

Antihypertensive effect of ragaglitazar:: A novel PPARα and γ dual activator

期刊

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 129-135

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2006.03.020

关键词

ragaglitazar; peroxisome proliferators activated receptor (PPAR); hypertension

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ragaglitazar is a novel and potent dual peroxisome proliferators activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and gamma activator. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of ragaglitazar on blood pressure and endothelial function in insulin resistant animal model and non-insulin resistant hypertensive models. The effects ragaglitazar were tested in Zucker fa/fa, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), 2 kidney 1clip rat (2K1C) and Wistar Kyoto rats (WKY). Pioglitazone was taken as a comparative standard. Ragaglitazar showed significant reduction (P < 0.001) of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in insulin resistant fa/fa rats, with concomitant reduction in plasma triglycerides (TG) and insulin levels while pioglitazone (10 mg kg(-1)) showed significant (P < 0.05) but comparatively less reduction. Ragaglitazar in contrast to pioglitazone showed significant reduction (P < 0.05) of SBP in SHR, 2K1C while the same dose did not have any effect on normotensive WKY Ragaglitazar also showed significant improvement in acetylcholine-induced relaxation in isolated aorta of Zucker fa/fa, SHR, 2K1C and also potentiated the insulin-induced vasorelaxation in Zucker fa/fa rats. These findings summarize that ragaglitazar shows significant reduction of BP and improvement in endothelial function not only in insulin resistant but also in non-insulin resistant hypertensive models where standard thiazolidinediones are ineffective. These data indicates that dual PPAR alpha and gamma activator ragaglitazar can be beneficial for the treatment of hypertension and vascular disease commonly associated with type 2 diabetes. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据