4.7 Article

Bringing VY canis majoris down to size: An improved determination of its effective temperature

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 646, 期 2, 页码 1203-1208

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/505025

关键词

stars : evolution; stars : late-type; stars : mass loss; supergiants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The star VY CMa is a late-type M supergiant with many peculiarities, mostly related to the intense circumstellar environment due to the star's high mass-loss rate. Claims have been made that would imply that this star is considerably more luminous (L similar to 5x10(5) L-circle dot) and larger (R similar to 2800 R-circle dot) than other Galactic red supergiants (RSGs). Indeed, such a location in the H-R diagram would be well within the Hayashi forbidden zone,'' where stars cannot be in hydrostatic equilibrium. These extraordinary properties, however, rest on an assumed effective temperature of 2800 - 3000 K, far cooler than recent work has shown RSGs to be. To obtain a better estimate, we fit newly obtained spectrophotometry in the optical and NIR with the same MARCS models used for our recent determination of the physical properties of other RSGs; we also use V - K and V - J from the literature to derive an effective temperature. We find that the star likely has a temperature of 3650 K, a luminosity L similar to 6 x 10(4) L-circle dot, and a radius of similar to 600 R-circle dot. These values are consistent with VY CMa being an ordinary, evolved 15 M-circle dot RSG and agree well with the Geneva evolutionary tracks. We find that the circumstellar dust region has a temperature of 760 K, and an effective radius of similar to 130 AU, if spherical geometry is assumed for the latter. What causes this star to have such a high mass loss and large variations in brightness ( but with little change in color) remains a mystery at present, although we speculate that perhaps this star and NML Cyg are simply normal RSGs caught during an unusually unstable time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据