4.6 Article

Older adults discharged from the hospital with delirium: 1-year outcomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
卷 54, 期 8, 页码 1245-1250

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00815.x

关键词

delirium; mortality; nursing home placement

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P30AG21342, K24AG00949, R21AG025193] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES: To compare 1-year institutionalization and mortality rates of patients who were delirious at discharge, patients whose delirium resolved by discharge, and patients who were never delirious in the hospital. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of prospective cohort data from the Delirium Prevention Trial. SETTING: General medicine service at Yale New Haven Hospital, March 25, 1995, through March 18, 1998, with follow-up interviews completed in 2000. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred thirty-three patients aged 70 and older who were not delirious at admission. MEASUREMENTS: Patients underwent daily assessments of delirium from admission to discharge using the Confusion Assessment Method. Nursing home placement and mortality were determined at 1-year follow up. RESULTS: Of the 433 study patients, 24 (5.5%) had delirium at discharge, 31 (7.2%) had delirium that resolved during hospitalization, and 378 (87.3%) were never delirious. After 1 year of follow-up, 20 of 24 (83.3%) patients discharged with delirium, 21 of 31 (67.7%) patients whose delirium resolved, and 157 of 378 (41.5%) patients who were never delirious were admitted to a nursing home or died. Compared with patients who were never delirious, patients with delirium at discharge had a multivariable adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2.64 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.60-4.35) for nursing home placement or mortality, whereas resolved cases had a HR of 1.53 (95% CI = 0.962.43). CONCLUSION: Delirium at discharge is associated with a high rate of nursing home placement and mortality over a 1 year follow-up period. Interventions to increase detection of delirium and improvements in transitional care may help reduce these negative outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据