4.8 Article

Combined effect of proteasome and calpain inhibition on cisplatin-resistant human melanoma cells

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 66, 期 15, 页码 7598-7605

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2614

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Resistance of tumor cells to cisplatin is a common feature frequently encountered during chemotherapy against melanoma caused by various known and unknown mechanisms. To overcome drug resistance toward cisplatin, a targeted treatment using alternative agents, such as proteasome inhibitors, has been investigated. This combination could offer a new therapeutic approach. Here, we report the biological effects of proteasome inhibitors on the parental cisplatin-sensitive MeWo human melanoma cell line and its cisplatin-resistant MeWo(cis1) variant. Our experiments show that proteasome inhibitor treatment of both cell lines impairs cell viability at concentrations that are not toxic to primary human fibroblasts in vitro. However, compared with the parental MeWo cell line, significantly higher concentrations of proteasome inhibitor are required to reduce cell viability of MeWo(cis1) cells. Moreover, whereas proteasome activity was inhibited to the same extent in both cell lines, I kappa B alpha degradation and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) activation in MeWo(cis1) cells was proteasome inhibitor independent but essentially calpain inhibitor sensitive. In support, a calpain-specific inhibitor impaired NF-kappa B activation in MeWo(cis1) cells. Here, we show that cisplatin resistance in MeWo(cis1) is accompanied by a change in the NF-kappa B activation pathway in favor of calpain-mediated I kappa B alpha degradation. Furthermore, combined exposure to proteasome and calpain inhibitor resulted in additive effects and a strongly reduced cell viability of MeWo(cis1) cells. Thus, combined strategies targeting distinct proteolytic pathways may help to overcome mechanisms of drug resistance in tumor cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据