4.0 Article

Dystrophin Nonsense Mutations Can Generate Alternative Rescue Transcripts in Lymphocytes

期刊

ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 717-724

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2008.00468.x

关键词

dystrophin; Duchenne muscular dystrophy; nonsense mutation; exon skipping; splicing

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Health and Labor Science Research
  3. Research on Psychiatric and Neurological Diseases and Mental Health [17A-10]
  4. Nervous and Mental Disorders
  5. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secondary alterations in splicing have been reported to produce semi-functional mRNA from several nonsense mutations in the dystrophin gene. Disruptions of exonic splicing enhancers by single nucleotide changes are thought to underlie such alterations. The precise frequencies of such nonsense mutation-dependent splicing alterations, however, remain unknown. Here we analyzed the splicing patterns of dystrophin mRNA in lymphocytes from 38 patients with dystrophinopathies due to nonsense mutations in the dystrophin gene. In seven of the cases (18%), we observed partial skipping of the nonsense-encoding exon. Two of the seven cases, however, exhibited complex activation of a nonsense mutation-created splice site, which resulted in the generation of novel transcripts. Examination of cis-regulatory splicing elements through calculation of splicing probability scores and identification of potential splicing enhancer or silencer sequences failed to disclose a single cause for exon skipping. Remarkably, individual differences in splicing patterns were observed for cells from patients with identical nonsense mutations (C.5899C > T). Although five cases produced semi-functional dystrophin mRNAs, only one of these exhibited a mild clinical course. These results provide important insights about targets for exon skipping induced by candidate antisense oligonucleotides and for ribosomal read-through of nonsense mutations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据