4.4 Article

A novel branching enzyme of the GH-57 family in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 188, 期 16, 页码 5915-5924

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.00390-06

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Branching enzyme (BE) catalyzes formation of the branch points in glycogen and amylopectin by cleavage of the alpha-1,4 linkage and its subsequent transfer to the alpha-1,6 position. We have identified a novel BE encoded by an uncharacterized open reading frame (TK1436) of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis KOD1. TK1436 encodes a conserved protein showing similarity to members of glycoside hydrolase family 57 (GH-57 family). At the C terminus of the TK1436 protein, two copies of a helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motif were found. TK1436 orthologs are distributed in archaea of the order Thermococcales, cyanobacteria, some actinobacteria, and a few other bacterial species. When recombinant TK1436 protein was incubated with amylose used as the substrate, a product peak was detected by high-performance anion-exchange chromatography, eluting more slowly than the substrate. Isoamylase treatment of the reaction mixture significantly increased the level of short-chain alpha-glucans, indicating that the reaction product contained many alpha-1,6 branching points. The TK1436 protein showed an optimal pH of 7.0, an optimal temperature of 70 degrees C, and thermostability up to 90 degrees C, as determined by the iodine-staining assay. These properties were the same when a protein devoid of HhH motifs (the TK1436 Delta H protein) was used. The average molecular weight of branched glucan after reaction with the TK1436 Delta H protein was over 100 times larger than that of the starting substrate. These results clearly indicate that TK1436 encodes a structurally novel BE belonging to the GH-57 family. Identification of an overlooked BE species provides new insights into glycogen biosynthesis in microorganisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据