4.5 Article

Multiple sclerosis, natalizumab therapy, and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROLOGY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 341-349

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.wco.0000236612.66839.a2

关键词

JC virus; multiple sclerosis; natalizumab; progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Multiple sclerosis affects many people, often in early adulthood, and causes significant disability. Natalizumab is a novel agent to be evaluated for multiple sclerosis and Crohn's disease that has demonstrated unique efficacy but has unfortunately been implicated in three cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. This review covers the mechanism of action of natalizumab and efficacy for multiple sclerosis, the three cases of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, our understanding of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and the mechanisms that may account for these events. Recent findings Natalizumab, an anti-alpha 4-integrin antibody, binds to T-cell surface receptors to prevent migration from the circulation into the brain tissue. Phase II and III trials have been completed and demonstrate previously unseen efficacy in preventing relapses and disease progression. The cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, two fatal and one disabling, resulted in the voluntary suspension of natalizumab and bring this entire class of agents into doubt. It is important to determine what led to the development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in the natalizurnab-associated cases and to advance understanding and continue to develop therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Summary. With ongoing safety evaluations, natalizumab is being reevaluated by the US Food and Drug Administration for possible reapproval and return to the market. If natalizumab is reapproved, challenging questions and issues will remain in treating patients with multiple sclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据