4.7 Article

Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination in 133 advanced soft-tissue sarcomas: A retrospective analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 706-711

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21867

关键词

advanced soft-tissue sarcoma; docetaxel; gemcitabine; leiomyosarcoma

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advanced soft-tissue sarcomas are usually resistant to cytotoxic agents such as doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Antitumor activity has been observed for gemcitabine and docetaxel combination. We conducted a retrospective study on 133 patients (58 males/75 females) with unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. The median age at diagnosis was 51.7 (18-82), with 76 patients with leiomoyosarcoma and 57 patients with other histological subtypes. The initial localizations were limb (44), uterine (32), retroperitoneal (23) and organs or bone (34). Patients received 900 mg/m(2) Of gemcitabine (days I and 8) over 90 min Plus too mg/m(2) of docetaxel (day 8), intravenously every 21 days. Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was well tolerated with an overall response of 18.4% and with no clear statistical difference between leiomyosarcomas and other histological subtypes (24.2% versus 10.4% (p = 0.06)). No difference was found between uterine soft-tissue sarcomas versus others. The median overall survival was 12.1 months (1-28). Better overall, survival was correlated with leiomyosarcoma (p = 0.01) and with the quality of the response, even for patients with stable disease (p < 10(-4)). No statistical difference was found for the initial localization. Response to treatment and overall survival were better for patients in World Health Organization (WHO) performance status classification (PS) 0 at baseline versus patients in WHO PS-1, 2 or 3 (p = 0.023 and p < 10(-4), respectively). Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was tolerable and demonstrated better response and survival for leiomyosarcoma, especially for patients in WHO PS-0 at baseline. For the other histological subtypes, the response was not encouraging, but the survival for patients in response or stable suggests further investigation. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, hic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据