4.6 Article

Application of bacteriophages to control intestinal Escherichia coli O157:H7 levels in ruminants

期刊

APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 8, 页码 5359-5366

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00099-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR015587, P20 RR016454, P20-RR15587, P20-RR16454] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [U54 AI057141, U54-AI-57141] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [N01-HD-0-3309] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A previously characterized O157-specific lytic bacteriophage KH1 and a newly isolated phage designated SH1 were tested, alone or in combination, for reducing intestinal Escherichia coli O157:117 in animals. Oral treatment with phage KH1 did not reduce the intestinal E. coli O157:117 in sheep. Phage SH1 formed clear and relatively larger plaques on lawns of all 12 E. coli O157:H7 isolates tested and had a broader host range than phage KH1, lysing O55:116 and 18 of 120 non-O157 E. coli isolates tested. In vitro, mucin or bovine mucus did not inhibit bacterial lysis by phage SHI or KHI. A phage treatment protocol was optimized using a mouse model of E. coli O157:117 intestinal carriage. Oral treatment with SHI or a mixture of SHI and KH1 at phage/bacterium ratios 2:102 terminated the presence of fecal E. coli O157:117 within 2 to 6 days after phage treatment. Untreated control mice remained culture positive for > 10 days. To optimize bacterial carriage and phage delivery in cattle, E. coli O157:117 was applied rectally to Holstein steers 7 days before the administration of 10(10) PFU SHI and KHI. Phages were applied directly to the rectoanal junction mucosa at phage/bacterium ratios calculated to be >= 10(2). In addition, phages were maintained at 10(6) PFU/ml in the drinking water of the phage treatment group. This phage therapy reduced the average number of E. coli O157:117 CFU among phage-treated steers compared to control steers (P < 0.05); however, it did not eliminate the bacteria from the majority of steers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据