4.4 Article

Maltodextrin utilization plays a key role in the ability of group A Streptococcus to colonize the oropharynx

期刊

INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 4605-4614

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00477-06

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [K12 RR 17655-04] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analysis of multiple group A Streptococcus (GAS) genomes shows that genes encoding proteins involved in carbohydrate utilization comprise some 15% of the core GAS genome. Yet there is a limited understanding of how carbohydrate utilization contributes to GAS pathogenesis. Previous genome-wide GAS studies led us to a focused investigation of MalE, a putative maltodextrin-binding protein. Analysis of 28 strains of 22 distinct M protein serotypes showed that MalE is highly conserved among diverse GAS strains. malE transcript levels were significantly increased during growth in human saliva compared to growth in a chemically defined glucose-containing medium or a nutrient-rich medium. MalE was accessible to antibody binding, indicating that it is expressed on the GAS cell surface. Moreover, growth in human saliva appeared to increase MalE surface expression compared to growth in a nutrient-rich medium. Analysis of a Delta malE isogenic mutant strain revealed decreased growth in human saliva compared to wild-type GAS. Radiollabeled carbohydrate binding assays showed that MalE was required for the binding of maltose but not glucose. The Delta malE isogenic mutant strain colonized a lower percentage of GAS-challenged mice compared to wild-type and genetically complemented strains. Furthermore, decreased numbers of CFU were recovered from mice infected with the Delta malE strain compared to those infected with wild-type GAS. These data demonstrate that maltodextrin acquisition is likely to be a key factor in the ability of GAS to successfully infect the oropharynx. Further investigation into carbohydrate transport and metabolism pathways may yield novel insights into GAS pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据