4.2 Article

Spot blotch continues to cause substantial grain yield reductions under resource-limited farming conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYTOPATHOLOGY
卷 154, 期 7-8, 页码 482-488

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.2006.01134.x

关键词

Bipolaris sorokiniana; Cochliobolus sativus; on-farm research; foliar blight; Triticum aestivum; yield loss

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spot blotch caused by Cochliobolus sativus, is an important disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in the warm areas of South Asia. In the past, efforts have been made to improve spot blotch resistance in susceptible commercial cultivars. It is important to assess how much spot blotch-induced yield loss still occurs under resource-limited farming conditions using a newly released wheat cultivar. The outcome could underline further work needed towards breeding for foliar blight resistance. The present 2-year study was conducted to determine the reduction in grain yield and its components in a newly released Nepali wheat cultivar, Gautam, on resource-poor farms under a rice-wheat cropping sequence. Spot blotch severity went up to 100% and 70% in 2004 and 2005 respectively. The use of the fungicide Opus (epoxiconazole) reduced disease severity to below 10% suggesting its value in controlling spot blotch in the absence of highly spot blotch resistant wheat cultivars. Grain yield loss due to spot blotch ranged from 4% to 38% and 25% to 43% in 2004 and 2005 respectively. Thousand-kernel weight and the number of kernels per spike were reduced respectively by 15% and 10% in 2004 and by 18% and 11% in 2005. The study shows that the level of resistance to spot blotch in the new cultivar Gautam represents a partial accomplishment in breeding for resistance over the past decade. The findings underscore the need for further research support for improving genetic resistance against spot blotch in wheat to increase food security among resource-poor farmers in the eastern Gangetic plains in South Asia and reduce the yield loss caused by this disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据