4.6 Article

Does nitrogen become limiting under high-P conditions in detritus-based tropical streams?

期刊

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
卷 51, 期 8, 页码 1515-1526

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01588.x

关键词

decomposition; leaf chemistry; microbial respiration; nutrient limitation; phosphorus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. We examined effects of nutrients on leaf breakdown in interior forest streams at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. We tested the hypothesis that dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) becomes limiting when ambient phosphorus (P) concentration is high. We also compared the breakdown of relatively 'low quality' leaves (lower C : N, Trema integerrima) with that of 'higher quality' leaves (higher C : N, Ficus insipida) in a high-P stream. 2. Litterbags were incubated in two streams: one enriched experimentally with P [target concentration 200 mu g soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) L-1] and one control (naturally low P concentration approximately 10 mu g SRP L-1). Ammonium enrichment was achieved by adding fertiliser upstream of half of the litterbags in each stream. 3. Phosphorus addition stimulated leaf breakdown, microbial respiration, ergosterol and leaf %P. Leaf breakdown rate was consistent with those in La Selva streams with naturally high P concentration. 4. Nitrogen (N) addition had no effect on leaf breakdown, microbial respiration, ergosterol or leaf chemistry in either the P-enriched or the reference stream, in spite of low N : P ratios. We conclude that N is probably not limiting in streams at La Selva that are naturally high in P. This may be due to moderately high ambient N concentration (> 200 mu g DIN L-1) prevailing throughout the year. 5. The species with a lower C : N decomposed more rapidly and supported higher microbial activity than that with a higher C : N. Subtle differences in leaf N content, as well as dissolved P concentration, may be important in determining microbial colonisation and subsequent leaf breakdown.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据