4.7 Article

Investigating heavy metal resistance, bioaccumulation and metabolic profile of a metallophile microbial consortium native to an abandoned mine

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 366, 期 2-3, 页码 649-658

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.025

关键词

zinc; cadmium; biolog; bioremediation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contaminated sites represent new ecological niches where historical pollution has originated an unusual microbial biodiversity. The knowledge of these microorganisms contributes to the discovery of new pathways and metabolic networks and may offer potential solutions for damaged areas. In the present work seven microbial consortia have been isolated from an abandoned mine of blend and galena (Ingurtosu, Italy) through a selection for resistance to zinc (tested up to 40 mM in solution). All the consortia were able to accumulate zinc and the best accumulator, named Ing5, has been studied for the following characteristics: resistance and accumulation of Zn, Cd, Hg, bioaccumulation mechanisms of Zn, and influence of Zn and Cd on the metabolic profile. The results indicate that the consortium Ing5 bears resistance systems for Cd and Hg as well as Zn and that, for some of the 5 isolates belonging to Ing5, the resistance thresholds are higher in consortium than in pure culture. The prevalent mechanism for zinc accumulation can be reasonably considered to be metabolism-dependent, inducible and regulated by metal concentrations. The study on the metabolic profile, carried out by the Biolog system, shows that Zn exerts a very low influence on the metabolic profile and that this influence can also be positive; Cd has a stronger negative influence but that, despite this, the consortium is able to maintain a wide metabolic potential in the presence of heavy metals. These features of Ing5 make it a good candidate for biotechnological applications and for further investigation of the degradation of organic pollutants in the presence of metals. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据