4.5 Article

Direct corticospinal pathways contribute to neuromuscular control of perturbed stance

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 101, 期 2, 页码 420-429

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01447.2005

关键词

posture; transcranial magnetic stimulation; H reflex; transcortical reflex loop; soleus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct corticospinal pathways contribute to neuromuscular control of perturbed stance. J Appl Physiol 101: 420-429, 2006. First published April 6, 2006; doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01447.2005. -The antigravity soleus muscle ( Sol) is crucial for compensation of stance perturbation. A corticospinal contribution to the compensatory response of the Sol is under debate. The present study assessed spinal, corticospinal, and cortical excitability at the peaks of short- (SLR), medium- (MLR), and long-latency responses (LLR) after posterior translation of the feet. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and peripheral nerve stimulation were individually adjusted so that the peaks of either motor evoked potential (MEP) or H reflex coincided with peaks of SLR, MLR, and LLR, respectively. The influence of specific, presumably direct, corticospinal pathways was investigated by H-reflex conditioning. When TMS was triggered so that the MEP arrived in the Sol at the same time as the peaks of SLR and MLR, EMG remained unaffected. Enhanced EMG was observed when the MEP coincided with the LLR peak (P < 0.001). Similarly, conditioning of the H reflex by subthreshold TMS facilitated H reflexes only at LLR (P < 0.001). The earliest facilitation after perturbation occurred after 86 ms. The TMS-induced H-reflex facilitation at LLR suggests that increased cortical excitability contributes to the augmentation of the LLR peaks. This provides evidence that the LLR in the Sol muscle is at least partly transcortical, involving direct corticospinal pathways. Additionally, these results demonstrate that similar to 86 ms after perturbation, postural compensatory responses are cortically mediated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据