4.6 Article

Characterization of rhodopsin P23H-induced retinal degeneration in a Xenopus laevis model of retinitis pigmentosa

期刊

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
卷 47, 期 8, 页码 3234-3241

出版社

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0213

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE. To investigate the pathogenic mechanisms that underlie retinal degeneration induced by the rhodopsin mutation P23H in a Xenopus laevis model of RP. METHODS. Transgenic X. laevis were generated that expressed the rhodopsin mutants rhoP23H and rhoP23H/K29R (a variant incapable of transducin activation). Using quantitative dot blot assay, transgenic rhodopsin levels and the extent of retinal degeneration were determined. The contribution of rhodopsin signal transduction to cell death was assessed by comparison of rhoP23H and rhoP23H/K296R effects and by dark rearing of rhoP23H tadpoles. Intracellular localization and the oligomeric state of rhoP23H were determined by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy and Western blot analysis. RESULTS. RhoP23H induced retinal degeneration in a dose-dependent manner whereas expression of a control rhodopsin did not, indicating that rod photoreceptor death was specific to the P23H mutation and was not caused by the overexpression of rhodopsin. Neither abolishment of rhoP23H photosensitivity and ability to activate transducin nor dark rearing rescued rod viability. RhoP23H was localized primarily to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of inner segments. Western blot analysis of transgenic retinas showed that rhoP23H was prone to form dimers and higher molecular weight oligomers. However, aggresomes were not observed in rhoP23H transgenic retinal sections, despite their being reported in cultured cells expressing rhoP23H. CONCLUSIONS. These results support a role for rhoP23H misfolding and inner segment accumulation in rod death, possibly by ER overload or other cellular stress pathways rather than by altered rhodopsin signal transduction or aggresome formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据