4.5 Article

DNA methylation analysis of tumor suppressor genes in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

期刊

ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 89, 期 2, 页码 191-199

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00277-009-0818-3

关键词

MGUS; Multiple myeloma; DNA methylation; Tumor suppressor genes

资金

  1. National Research Council (CONICET)
  2. National Agency of Scientific and Technical Promotion (ANPCyT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant DNA methylation is considered an important epigenetic mechanism for gene inactivation. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is believed to be a precursor of multiple myeloma (MM). We have analyzed methylation status of p15 (INK4B) , p16 (INK4A) , ARF, SOCS-1, p27 (KIP1) , RASSF1A, and TP73 genes in bone marrow DNA samples from 21 MGUS and 44 MM patients, in order to determine the role of aberrant promoter methylation as one of the steps involved in the progression of MGUS to MM. Methylation specific polymerase chain reaction assay followed by DNA sequencing of the resulting product was performed. SOCS-1 gene methylation was significantly more frequent in MM (52%) than in MGUS (14%; p = 0,006). Methylation frequencies of TP73, ARF, p15 (INK4B) , p16 (INK4A) , and RASSF1A were comparable in MGUS: 33%, 29%, 29%, 5%, and 0%, to that observed in MM: 45%, 29%, 32%, 7%, and 2%. All patients lacked methylation at p27 (KIP1) gene. In both entities, a concurrent methylation of p15 (INK4B) and TP73 was observed. The mean methylation index of MGUS was lower (0.16) than that of MM (0.24; p < 0.05). Correlations with clinicopathologic characteristics showed a higher mean age in MGUS patients with SOCS-1 methylated (p < 0.001); meanwhile in MM, methylation of p15 (INK4B) was more frequent in males (p = 0.009) and IgG isotype (p = 0.038). Our findings suggest methylation of TP73, ARF, p15 (INK4B) , and p16 (INK4A) as early events in the pathogenesis and development of plasma cell disorders; meanwhile, SOCS-1 methylation would be an important step in the clonal evolution from MGUS to MM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据