4.5 Article

High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: Interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
卷 187, 期 2, 页码 330-337

出版社

AMER ROENTGEN RAY SOC
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0998

关键词

BI-RADS MRI descriptors; breast; breast cancer; high spatial resolution; MRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess an interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors and high-spatial-resolution MR images in lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Retrospective review was performed of 30 consecutive lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. MRI was performed on a 1.5-T scanner using the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence. The distribution patterns were classified into three categories: single quadrant/solitary lesion (linear), single quadrant/grouped lesion (focal, regional, segmental), and multiquadrant lesion (multiple regions, diffuse). The presence of a ductal pattern was assessed in the enhancing lesions after the tumor distribution had been decided. In addition to the BI-RADS MRI descriptors, the presence of clustered ring enhancement was also assessed in heterogeneous enhancing lesions. RESULTS. The most frequent morphologic finding among the benign lesions was a linear pattern (50%) followed by homogeneous internal enhancement (42%), whereas a segmental pattern (56%) (p = 0.003), heterogeneous internal enhancement (44%), and clustered ring enhancement (44%) (p = 0.01) were the most frequent findings in malignant lesions. The features with the highest positive predictive value for carcinoma were a segmental distribution (100%), a clustered ring enhancement (100%), and a clumped internal architecture (88%). Using this interpretation model, the positive predictive value for carcinoma was 94%. CONCLUSION. A combination of BI-RADS MRI descriptors and clustered ring enhancement criteria is useful for the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据