4.7 Article

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors allow locomotor and rewarding responses to nicotine

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1704-1713

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300987

关键词

MAOIs; nicotine; locomotor activity; beta 2 nAChR subunit knockout; self administration

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA13332] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although nicotine is generally considered to be the main compound responsible for the addictive properties of tobacco, experimental data indicate that nicotine does not exhibit all the characteristics of other abused substances, such as psychostimulants and opiates. For example, nicotine is only a weak locomotor enhancer in rats and generally fails to induce a locomotor response in mice, This observation contradicts the general consensus that all drugs of abuse release dopamine in the nucleus accumbens, a subcortical structure, and thus increase locomotor activity in rodents. Because tobacco smoke contains monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and decreases MAO activity in smokers, we have combined MAOIs with nicotine to determine whether it is possible to obtain a locomotor response to nicotine in C57B16 mice. Among 15 individual or combined MAOIs, including harmane, norharmane, moclobemide, selegiline, pargyline, clorgyline, tranylcypromine and phenelzine, only irreversible inhibitors of both MAO-A and -B (tranylcypromine, phenelzine, and clorgyline + selegiline) allowed a locomotor response to nicotine. The locomotor stimulant interaction of tranylcypromine and nicotine was absent in beta 2-nicolinic acetylcholine receptor subunit knockout mice. Finally, it was found that, whereas naive rats did not readily self-administer nicotine (10 mu g/kg/injection), a robust self-administration of nicotine occurred when animals were pretreated with tranylcypromine (3 mg/kg). Our data suggest that MAOIs contained in tobacco and tobacco smoke act in synergy with nicotine to enhance its rewarding effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据