4.5 Article

Prevalence of nutritional depletion in a large out-patient population of patients with COPD

期刊

RESPIRATORY MEDICINE
卷 100, 期 8, 页码 1349-1355

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.11.023

关键词

COPD; nutritional depletion; body composition; out-patient population

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The present study focuses on the prevalence of nutritional depletion in relation to functional performance, airflow limitation, experienced dyspnoea and health status in a large multi-center out-patient population with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: In 39 out-patient centers in The Netherlands, 389 patients with moderate to severe COPD (217 men) were recruited. The study evaluated on the baseline characteristics of the COSMIC study. Measurements included body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis, dyspnoea by MRC-score, peripheral muscle function by isometric handgrip strength and disease-specific health status by St. George Respiratory Questionnaire. Results: The prevalence of nutritional depletion (defined as body mass index (BMI) <= 21 kg/m(2) and/or fat-free mass index (FFMI) <= 15 (females) or <= 16 (males) kg/m(2)) was high (27%). Prevalence of normal BMI and low FFMI was 15%, and of tow BMI and tow FFMI 11%. The prevalence of low BMI as welt as tow FFMI was significantly higher in female than in mate COPD patients, 18% and 40% vs. 10% and 20%, respectively (both P < 0.01). No differences in FEV1%predicted, dyspnoea score and health status were observed between depleted and non-depteted COPD patients. Multiple linear regression analysis in the total group showed that handgrip strength correlated with FFMI after correction for sex distribution and age, but not FEV1%predicted. Conclusions: The prevalence of nutritional depletion was high in a large out-patient COPD population in The Netherlands, especially in female COPD patients. Depletion of FFM was associated with impaired peripheral muscle strength, independent of disease severity. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据