4.5 Article

Projections of regional changes in forest net primary productivity for different tree species in Europe driven by climate change and carbon dioxide

期刊

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 211-225

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-013-0306-8

关键词

4C (FORESEE); CO2 effects; Environmental change; Level-II plots; Process-based modelling; Uncertainties

类别

资金

  1. EC FP7 MOTIVE project [226544]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Projecting changes in forest productivity in Europe is crucial for adapting forest management to changing environmental conditions. The objective of this paper is to project forest productivity changes under different climate change scenarios at a large number of sites in Europe with a stand-scale process-based model. We applied the process-based forest growth model 4C at 132 typical forest sites of important European tree species in ten environmental zones using climate change scenarios from three different climate models and two different assumptions about CO2 effects on productivity. This paper shows that future forest productivity will be affected by climate change and that these effects depend strongly on the climate scenario used and the persistence of CO2 effects. We find that productivity increases in Northern Europe, increases or decreases in Central Europe, and decreases in Southern Europe. This geographical pattern is mirrored by the responses of the individual tree species. The productivity of Scots pine and Norway spruce, mostly located in central and northern Europe, increases while the productivity of Common beech and oak in southern regions decreases. It is important to note that we consider the physiological response to climate change excluding disturbances or management. Different climate change scenarios and assumptions about the persistence of CO2 effects lead to uncertain projections of future forest productivity. These uncertainties need to be integrated into forest management planning and adaptation of forest management to climate change using adaptive management frameworks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据