4.5 Article

Genetic differentiation in Pinus brutia Ten. using molecular markers and quantitative traits: the role of altitude

期刊

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 345-351

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-011-0169-9

关键词

Turkish red pine; Haplotypic variability; Local adaptation; Altitudinal variation; Genetic differentiation

类别

资金

  1. Akdeniz University Scientific Research Projects Unit [2008.03.0121.006]
  2. European Union (EVOLTREE Network of Excellence)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Environment [CC03-048, AEG06-054]
  4. Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)-BIDEB/BDP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) is widespread in the eastern Mediterranean Basin. In the late 1970s, four common gardens were established along steep altitudinal transects extending from the coast to about 1,200 m in the Taurus Mountains (Antalya, Turkey). The aim was to study the role of altitude in shaping Turkish red pine genetic diversity and population structure as well as to evaluate the existence of local adaptation along altitudinal gradients in this species. Genetic diversity and population structure were evaluated in replicated altitudinal gradients using chloroplast microsatellite (cpSSR) markers. Genetic differentiation for neutral markers was compared with quantitative differentiation for growth traits for the same populations evaluated at different altitudes. Genetic differentiation among altitudinal groups was higher than among transects. A high portion of the genetic variance corresponded to families within populations (up to 10.75%). Overall quantitative genetic differentiation (Q (ST)) was higher than molecular differentiation in most test sites for all the traits and ages considered. Turkish red pine shows signatures of local adaptation to environmental gradients related to altitude. For forestry practices, such as selection of seed sources, both altitude and the family level of variation need to be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据