4.5 Article

Global pattern of leaf litter nitrogen and phosphorus in woody plants

期刊

ANNALS OF FOREST SCIENCE
卷 67, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1051/forest/2010047

关键词

nitrogen; phosphorus; woody plants; leaf-litter; climate

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [30671674, 30800138]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (STCSM) [072307063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forest ecosystems exert an important influence on global biogeochemical cycles. A global dataset of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations in leaf-litter of woody plants was compiled from the literature. Among the 677 data sets, 482 included P concentrations and the N: P ratio. At a global scale, the mean leaf-litter N and P and N:P ratio were 10.9 mg g(-1), 0.85 mg g(-1) and 18.3, respectively. Leaf-litter N and P were significantly correlated. When the data was grouped by continents, the highest mean N was found in Africa (19.5 mg g(-1)), and the lowest in North America (8.18 mg g(-1)). P was significantly smaller in the Asian Islands (Japan and Malaysia, 0.44 mg g(-1)) than on the Asian mainland. For the global dataset, leaf-litter N increased linearly with mean annual temperature and annual precipitation and decreased with latitude. Although leaf-litter P showed no significant relationship with temperature, it declined linearly with precipitation and there was a convex quadratic relationship with latitude. For the global dataset and also for different functional groups (e.g. shrubs, evergreen broadleaf, deciduous broadleaf, and conifers) the leaf-litter N:P ratio generally followed a positive linear relationship with temperature and precipitation, and showed a concave quadratic response with latitude. The differences in leaf-litter N:P ratio among functional groups and among continents should be taken into account when modeling biogeochemical cycles in different regions as well as on a global scale.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据