4.6 Article

C-reactive protein levels and coronary artery disease incidence and mortality in apparently healthy men and women: The EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study 1993-2003

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 187, 期 2, 页码 415-422

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.09.023

关键词

C-reactive protein; coronary artery disease; prospective case-control study; risk factors

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0401527, MC_U106179471] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U106179471, G0401527] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels has been proposed as a useful marker to improve the prediction of future coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, but this notion has been challenged recently. Methods and results: We performed a prospective case-control study among apparently healthy men and women. The odds ratio (OR) for future CAD incidence was 2.49 (95% CI = 2.02-3.08, p for linearity < 0.0001) unadjusted, and 1.66 (95% CI = 1.31-2.12, p for linearity < 0.0001), after adjustment for classical cardiovascular risk factors, for top versus bottom quartile of the CRP distribution. Notably, the risk factor adjusted predictive value was substantially stronger for fatal CAD (OR = 2.92, 95% CI = 1.83-4.67, p, for linearity < 0.0001) than for non-fatal CAD (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.93-1.66, p, for linearity = 0.06). CRP levels were among the strongest predictors of CAD incidence and mortality. CRP levels remained a statistically significant predictor of future CAD, even after adjustment for the Framingham risk score. Conclusions: In this British cohort with risk factor levels representative of a contemporary Western population, CRP concentration was among the strongest predictors of CAD incidence and mortality. We suggest that current guidelines on CRP measurement in clinical practice should be based on contemporary and representative populations. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据