4.5 Article

A solvent stable metalloprotease produced by Bacillus sp TKU004 and its application in the deproteinization of squid pen for β-chitin preparation

期刊

ENZYME AND MICROBIAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 724-731

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.12.007

关键词

Bacillus; protease; squid pen; chitin; deproteinization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A protease-producing bacterium was isolated and identified as Bacillus sp. TKU004. It thus can be used for deproteinization of squid pen in the preparation of beta-chitin. The optimized condition for protease production was found when the culture was shaken at 30 degrees C for 4 days in 100 mL of medium containing 2% squid pen powder (SPP) (w/v), 0.1% K2HPO4, and 0.05% MgSO4. Under such condition, both the production of protease by Bacillus sp. TKU004 and the resulted protein removal of squid pen attained the optimum. They were 0.065 U/mL and 73%, respectively. An extracellular protease was purified from the culture supernatant of Bacillus sp. TKU004. The molecular weight of TKU004 protease was 27 and 57 kDa assayed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and gel filtration, respectively. The optimum pH, optimum temperature, pH stability, thermal stability, K-m, V-max, and activation energy of TKU004 protease were 6-8, 60 degrees C, pH 5-8, 50 degrees C, 2.98 mg/mL, 0.14 U/mL, 8.31 J/(mol K), respectively. It was concluded that TKU004 protease is a Zn-containing metalloenzyme, and its dimeric structure contains at least one disulfide bond. The unique characteristic of TKU004 protease is that it retained more than 60% of its original activity after preincubation for 10 days at 25 degrees C in the presence of tested organic solvents (25%, v/v). This is also the first report of a strain being able to use squid pen as the sole carbon/nitrogen source for proteases production and being used for the reclamation of beta-chitin from squid pen. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据