4.7 Article

The anterior intraparietal sulcus mediates grasp execution, independent of requirement to update: New insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 26, 期 31, 页码 8176-8182

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1641-06.2006

关键词

motor control; grasping; intraparietal sulcus; dorsal stream; computational models; perception and action

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS44393, NS33505] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although a role of the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in grasping is becoming evident, the specific contribution of regions within the IPS remains undefined. In this vein, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was delivered to the anterior (aIPS), middle (mIPS), and caudal (cIPS) IPS in two tasks designed to dissociate the potential roles of the IPS in either grasp planning or execution ( task 1) and its involvement in error detection or error correction ( task 2). Determining the involvement of specific regions of the IPS in perceptual ( planning and error detection) versus motor ( execution and correction) components of grasping allowed us to assess the ecological validity of competing computational models attempting to simulate reach-to-grasp movements. In task 1, we demonstrate that, when no on-line adjustment is necessary, TMS to aIPS ( but not mIPS or cIPS) disrupts grasping; this disruption is only elicited when TMS is applied during the execution ( but not the planning) phase of the movement. Task 2 reveals that TMS to aIPS ( but not mIPS or cIPS) disrupts grasping in the presence of a perturbation; this disruption is only elicited when TMS is applied during the error correction ( but not error detection) phase of the movement. We propose that the specific contribution of the aIPS in grasping is in the on-line computation of a difference vector based on motor goal, efference copy, and sensory inputs. This computation is performed for both stable and perturbed motor goals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据