4.7 Article

Spatial memory formation and memory-enhancing effect of glucose involves activation of the tuberous sclerosis complex-mammalian target of rapamycin pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 26, 期 31, 页码 8048-8056

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0671-06.2006

关键词

AICAR; glucose; hippocampus; rapamycin; spatial memory; tuberous sclerosis complex

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH072933] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35457, NS049160] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tuberous sclerosis complex-mammalian target of rapamycin (TSC- mTOR) cascade integrates growth factor and nutritional signals to regulate the synthesis of specific proteins. Because both growth factor signaling and glucose have been implicated in memory formation, we questioned whether mTOR activity is required for long-term spatial memory formation and whether this cascade is involved in the memory-augmenting effect of centrally applied glucose. To test our hypothesis, we directly administered rapamycin ( an inhibitor of mTOR), glucose, 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1 beta-4-ribonucleoside ( AICAR; an activator of AMP kinase), or glucose plus rapamycin into the dorsal hippocampus after we trained rats in the Morris water maze task. The results from these studies indicate that glucose enhances, whereas AICAR and rapamycin both impair, long-term spatial memory. Furthermore, the memory- impairing effect of targeted rapamycin administration could not be overcome by coadministration of glucose. Consistent with these behavioral results, biochemical analysis revealed that glucose and AICAR had opposing influences on the activation of the TSC- mTOR cascade, as indicated by the phosphorylation of ribosomal S6 kinase (S6K) and 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1), targets of mTOR. Together, these findings suggest that memory formation requires the mTOR cascade and that the memory- enhancing effect of glucose involves its ability to activate this pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据