4.5 Article

Molecular Simulations of outersphere reorganization energies in polar and quadrupolar solvents. The case of intramolecular electron and hole transfer

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 110, 期 30, 页码 14950-14955

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp061069h

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Outersphere reorganization energies (lambda) for intramolecular electron and hole transfer are studied in anionand cation-radical forms of complex organic substrates (p-phenylphenyl-spacer-naphthyl) in polar (water, 1,2-dichloroethane, tetrahydrofuran) and quadrupolar (supercritical CO2) solvents. Structure and charge distributions of solute molecules are obtained at the HF/6-31G(d,p) level. Standard Lennard-Jones parameters for solutes and the nonpolarizable simple site-based models of solvents are used in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Calculation of lambda is done by means of the original procedure, which treats electrostatic polarization of a solvent in terms of a usual nonpolarizable MD scheme supplemented by scaling of reorganization energies at the final stage. This approach provides a physically relevant background for separating inertial and inertialless polarization responses by means of a single parameter epsilon(infinity), optical dielectric permittivity of the solvent. Absolute lambda values for hole transfer in 1,2-dichloroethane agree with results of previous computations in terms of the different technique (MD/FRCM, Leontyev, I. V.; et al. Chem. Phys. 2005, 319, 4). Computed lambda values for electron transfer in tetrahydrofuran are larger than the experimental values by ca. 2.5 kcal/mol; for the case of hole transfer in 1,2-dichloroethane the discrepancy is of similar magnitude provided the experimental data are properly corrected. The MD approach gives nonzero lambda values for charge-transfer reaction in supercritical CO2, being able to provide a uniform treatment of nonequilibrium solvation phenomena in both quadrupolar and polar solvents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据