4.7 Article

Early tolerance to the hypophagic effect of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716 does not impede blockade of an orexigenic stimulus

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 542, 期 1-3, 页码 116-120

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.05.028

关键词

SR141716; hexarelin; food intake; tolerance; body weight

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716 (Rimonabant (R)) is known to reduce food intake by central and peripheral mechanisms. Recently, SR141716 has been reported to block the orexigenic effect of ghrelin, a potent orexigenic peptide produced by the stomach. This study investigated whether in rats, made tolerant to the hypophagic effect of SR141716, the drug was still capable to block the orexigenic activity of another non-natural (hypothalamic) peptide, i.e., the growth hormone releasing peptide (GHRP) hexarelin, a ghrelin mimetic. In the acute experiments, each dose of SR141716 (1, 5 and 10 mg/kg i.p.) reduced food intake with respect to vehicle-treated rats, whereas hexarelin (160 mu g/kg s.c.) markedly stimulated feeding. All doses of SR141716 were capable to reduce the orexigenic effect of the GHRP. A 15-day' administration of SR141716 (10 mg/kg i.p.) reduced both food intake and body weight. Tolerance to the hypophagic effect of SR141716 developed within 5 days, but in contrast, body weight remained markedly below that of vehicle-treated group throughout the entire treatment period. Interestingly, despite development of tolerance to its hypophagic effect, SR141716 was capable to suppress the orexigenic effect of repeated hexarelin challenge tests performed throughout the chronic experiments. In conclusion, the results of the present study confirm and broaden the existence of a functional relationship between ghrelin and endocannabinoids in the control of food intake, and bespeak the ability of a CB 1 receptor antagonist to suppress orexia caused by stimuli alien to direct stimulation of the cannabinoid system. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据