4.4 Article

Cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB) and CAAT enhancer-binding protein, β (C/EBPβ) bind chimeric DNA sites with high affinity

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 45, 期 31, 页码 9615-9623

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi052521a

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Basic region leucine zipper (bZIP) proteins are transcription factors that interact selectively with duplex DNA to regulate gene expression. Specifically, the cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) interacts with the cAMP response element (CRE) DNA site with high affinity, while it binds the CAAT/enhancer-binding protein (CEBP) DNA site with low affinity. Despite the selectivity of CREB for the CRE site, CREB-dependent transcription is observed via chimeric DNA sites with similarities to both CRE and CEBP sites. Because CRE/CEBP and CEBP/CRE chimeric DNA are relevant for transcription regulation but have not been rigorously characterized, quantitative electrophoretic mobility shift assays were used to characterize the binding affinity and specificity of CREB to the sites. In addition to CREB, C/EBP beta was tested because chimeric DNA was shown to stabilize CREB-C/EBP beta heterodimerization. Despite previous work, no CREB-C/EBP beta heterodimer was observed in the presence of chimeric DNA; only CREB and C/EBP beta homodimers were seen. The CREB homodimer bound to the chimeric sites with high affinity, demonstrating that the presence of one CRE half-site is sufficient for high-affinity interaction. A comparison of CREB and C/EBP, homodimers indicated that they bind the chimeric sites with similar, high affinity. Whereas the CRE and CEBP sites preferentially interact with CREB and C/EBP beta, respectively, the chimeric sites bind CREB and C/EBP beta competitively. Because DNA binding correlates with transcription regulation, the results suggest that gene expression from chimeric sites can be altered by small changes in relative bZIP concentrations or bZIP accessory factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据